Platform
Every part of the decision, in one evidence chain.
euviq is not a single feature. It is the structure that carries a software decision from first search to a document a procurement team can rely on.
Vendor intelligence
One structured profile per Vendor.
Legal entity, jurisdiction, ownership, deployment model and hosting — recorded the same way for every Vendor, so profiles are comparable by construction rather than by coincidence.
In practiceA procurement lead confirms who they would actually be contracting with before a call is even booked.
- Legal entity
- Nordkap Customer Intelligence Oy
- Jurisdiction
- Estonia (EU)
- Deployment
- Cloud · self-host available
- Data residencyVerified
- Hosting locationEvidence reviewed
- Legal entityVendor supplied
Evidence & verification
Claims tied to evidence, not asserted as fact.
Every claim carries a verification state: verified, evidence reviewed, vendor supplied, outdated, conflicting or unverified. The state reflects what euviq has actually checked, not what reads best.
In practiceA security reviewer sees that a residency claim rests on the vendor's word alone, and asks for more before signing.
“All customer data is stored within the European Union.”
Vendor statement · Security questionnaire
Checked against an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate issued by an independent certification body.
VerifiedComparison
Products set against the same criteria.
A shared axis of criteria, evaluated per product from its own evidence. Company facts a Product inherits from its Vendor are marked as inherited, never folded in as if they were Product-native.
In practiceThree shortlisted CRMs are placed side by side on hosting, residency and certification — with every gap left visible.
| Criterion | Product A | Product B | Product C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Verified | Contradicted | Not recorded |
| Data residency | Vendor supplied | Verified | Not recorded |
| Single sign-on | Not recorded | Refuted | Vendor supplied |
No score. No ranking. Unrecorded is shown as unrecorded, never as a negative.
Procurement evaluation
Requirements the buyer writes, evaluated on evidence.
Importance (required, preferred, informational), the condition, and the minimum evidence strength accepted — all authored by the buyer. euviq evaluates; it does not decide what matters.
In practiceA required 'EU hosting, independently reviewed' clause immediately rules out a product whose evidence is vendor-supplied only.
| Requirement | Product A | Product B |
|---|---|---|
| RequiredCustomer data stays in the EU | Met | Not met |
| PreferredSAML single sign-on available | Unknown | Met |
Buyer-authored requirements. euviq evaluates; the buyer decides.
Procurement reporting
A document the evaluation can stand behind.
The report is assembled from the evaluation the buyer already saw — no requirement is silently reworded, no finding is invented for the page. Every source cited is traceable.
In practiceThe report becomes the audit trail attached to the final procurement decision.
2 of 6 requirements met · 1 contradicted · 3 unknown
Assembled from the evaluation. Every source is cited; nothing is summarised away.